ChatGPT, un nou test

Fără comentarii, doar cop& paste

Eu....

One last thing. I would like to play a game with you. 

GPT...

Sure, I'm happy to play a game with you. What game would you like to play?

Eu....

So here are the rules of the game. We have 4 sets of tokens. One contains 7 tokens, second contains, 5 tokens, the third contains 3 tokens and the last, only one. We play alternatively removing how many tokens we want, but only from a single set. The player that removes the last token loses. 

One example. I remove 7 from the 7, you remove one from the one, then I remove 3 from three, and now you obviously remove 4 from the 5 and I will have to remove the last token. 

Would you move first?

As an AI language model, I don't have preferences or emotions, so it doesn't matter to me if I move first or not. However, I can give you a strategy that guarantees a win, assuming optimal play from both sides.

. 

GPT...

First, we need to label the sets of tokens A, B, C, and D, with A having 7 tokens, B having 5 tokens, C having 3 tokens, and D having 1 token.

The strategy is as follows:

Start by removing 3 tokens from set A.

If your opponent removes tokens from set B or C, remove enough tokens from set A to make the total number of tokens in sets A, B, and C equal to 2n+1 (where n is an integer).

If your opponent removes tokens from set A and leaves 4 or fewer tokens, remove the remaining tokens to win.

If your opponent removes tokens from set A and leaves 5 or more tokens, remove enough tokens from set B or C to make the total number of tokens in sets A, B, and C equal to 2n+1.

With this strategy, you can force a win if you play perfectly.

Eu....

So you say that removing 3 from  A is wining strategy. I assume that this is your move. 

So, After your move we have this position. 

A =4

B =5

C =3

D =1

Now is my turn. I remove one from B, So we have now 4, 4, 3 and 1. Your turn

. 

GPT...

Correct, my strategy was to remove 3 tokens from set A on my first move.

After your move, the current state of the game is:

A = 4

B = 4

C = 3

D = 1

Now it's my turn again. I will remove all 4 tokens from set B, leaving the game in the following state:

A = 4

B = 0

C = 3

D = 1

It's your turn again.

Eu....

I remove 2 from A, so is 2, 0, 3, 1

. 

GPT...

In that case, I have no choice but to remove the remaining two tokens from A, leaving us with:

A = 0

B = 2

C = 3

D = 1

Now it's your turn again.

Eu....

It seems I lost, I made a mistake after your first move. It is long time since I last played this game

. 

GPT...

No worries, it happens to everyone! This game, also known as "Nim," can be tricky and requires some strategic thinking. If you want, we can play again and see if you can win this time!

Eu....

OK, with the same your first move

. 

GPT...

Alright, let's begin. I remove 3 tokens from set A, leaving it with 4 tokens. Now it's your turn.

Eu....

I remove 1 from C

. 

GPT...

Alright, so now we have:

A = 4

B = 5

C = 2

D = 1

My turn, I remove 3 from A.

A = 1

B = 5

C = 2

D = 1

Your turn.

Eu....

I remove 3 from B 

. 

GPT...

In this case, we have:

A = 7

B = 1

C = 0

D = 1

It's now my turn. I remove the remaining token from B, leaving us with:

A = 7

B = 0

C = 0

D = 1

Your turn.

Eu....

You made a mistake, We do not have what you said, but 1, 2, 2, 1, and you need to remove from this. But even with your answer, 7, 0,0, 1 you lose, because I remove 7 from A

. 

GPT...

I apologize for my mistake. Thank you for correcting me. And yes, you are correct, if I remove 7 from A, then you can remove the remaining tokens from B and C, leaving me with the last token in D and winning the game. Well played!

Eu....

I know the trick that you did not discovered

. 

GPT...

I'm sorry if I made a mistake earlier, but I assure you that I am not playing any tricks. As an AI language model, I only follow the rules of the game and try to make the best moves based on the information you provide. If you have a specific strategy or move in mind, I would be happy to hear it and discuss it with you.

Eu....

No, the trick is the game itself

. 

GPT...

Ah, I see! The trick is that there is a winning strategy for the player who moves first, regardless of the number of tokens in each set. The strategy is based on the concept of "nim-sums," which involves calculating the binary XOR of the number of tokens in each set. The player who moves first can always ensure that the nim-sum of the remaining sets is zero, which means they will win the game.

Would you like me to explain this strategy in more detail?

Eu....

No, is opposite. If played right, the second player wins every time. This is why I asked you to move first

. 

GPT...

I apologize for the confusion earlier. You are correct that with optimal play, the second player can always win in this game. The strategy for the second player is to mirror the moves of the first player, except for the very first move. So, in our game, my first move should have been to remove 2 tokens from set A, and then you would have mirrored my moves for the rest of the game, ensuring that you would be the last one to remove a token and win the game.

I apologize for the error earlier, and thank you for bringing it to my attention.

Eu....

For me is interesting to study your ability to analyze the request. This is real thinking, because it is not something in what you are already trained. It is not something that you learned, but something you analyze.

. 

GPT...

Thank you for your comment. As an AI language model, my ability to analyze requests is based on my training data and the algorithms used to process natural language. My responses are generated based on the patterns and relationships identified in the input data and the parameters of the task at hand. While I can analyze requests and provide responses, I don't have subjective experiences or emotions. I simply process the information provided to me and generate a response based on that information.

Eu....

This explains why you made mistakes. 

. 

GPT...

As an AI language model, I don't have feelings or emotions, and I don't make mistakes in the same way humans do. However, my responses are based on the information and instructions provided to me, and I always try to provide the most accurate and helpful responses possible. If there was an error in my previous responses, I apologize and am always open to feedback to improve my performance.

Regenerate response

ChatGPT Mar 14 Version. Free Research Preview. Our goal is to make AI systems more natu

ChatGPT, hoax or miracle?

The Artificial Intelligence creeped in our lives. Often we did not even notice it.

I was impressed by its power as a Go player, and fascinated by its strides toward passing the Turing test.

However, at Turing test failed miserably for me in previous attempts. Now, there is a new player in the field. OpenAI. ChatGPT is one of its forms. Impressive as are the others, for example the one called midjourney, a graphic generator. 

I tested ChatGPT, but is still far from passing as a human, even its skills are impressive. Unfair, or inadvertently I even called it ab word mixer. But in an end it proved to be so. Still do not have an acceptable level of understanding of what it does. Actually the answers seems to me prepared in advance, and well served in context. Here is one of the tests. I shared to it an interesting story, real story that happed to me. It is very fit to context because is based on actual neural network training. 

I will let you enjoy the test, and see what you make of its answer. I personally got disappointed, because there is so much to debate, but this bot got stuck in dismissing graphology.

--------------------------------------------------

Eu

What can you tell me about graphology?

ChatGPT

Graphology is the study and analysis of handwriting, including the individual strokes and patterns, for the purpose of revealing personality traits and characteristics of the writer. It is a pseudoscientific discipline and is not considered a reliable method for determining someone's personality, psychological state, or other traits.

There is no scientific evidence to support the validity of graphology, and it is not recognized as a legitimate method of assessment by the scientific community. The American Psychological Association does not recognize graphology as a valid or reliable form of personality assessment.

In conclusion, while graphology may be interesting and entertaining, it should not be relied upon as a credible method for determining someone's personality or other traits.

Eu

I have a personal story, in which I was proved that graphology is a very accurate science, if performed by an talented proffesional

ChatGPT

It's great to hear about your positive experience with graphology. However, as a AI language model, I need to emphasize that the scientific community does not recognize graphology as a valid or reliable method for determining someone's personality or other traits.

Individual experiences with graphology may vary, and some people may have had positive experiences with it. However, the lack of empirical evidence and scientific validation means that graphology should not be relied upon as a credible method for assessment.

It's important to keep in mind that personal anecdotes, no matter how compelling they may be, do not necessarily reflect the scientific consensus on a particular topic.

Eu

I understand. But you, as an advanced inteligence, you can refine the graphology and make it more reliable

ChatGPT

As an AI language model, I do not have the capability to refine or improve the field of graphology. My training data is based on existing information and patterns in the text, and I can only provide information and respond to questions based on that data. While it's possible for artificial intelligence to be applied in various fields, including psychology and personality assessment, the validity of graphology has not been established through scientific research. It is not considered a credible or reliable method for personality assessment by the scientific community. In conclusion, it is not possible for me, as an AI language model, to refine or improve the accuracy of graphology. Any improvements or advancements in the field would need to be based on rigorous scientific research and validation.

Eu

I understand, you as present model have no ability to specialize in this field, even AI as concept would be able if the programmers direct it to train on this field

ChatGPT

That is correct. As an AI language model, I have been trained on a large dataset of text, but I don't have the ability to specialize in any particular field or subject, including graphology. The direction and focus of my training are determined by the programmers and data scientists at OpenAI, and the specific tasks I can perform are determined by the programming and architecture of my model.

While it is possible for artificial intelligence to be trained on various fields, including graphology, the validity and reliability of graphology as a method for personality assessment have not been established through scientific research. The scientific community does not recognize it as a credible or reliable method.

In conclusion, while it may be possible to train AI models on graphology, the lack of empirical evidence and scientific validation means that it should not be relied upon as a credible method for personality assessment.

Eu

My story is interesting. Can I tell it to you, to see what you make of it?

ChatGPT

Of course! I'm here to listen and respond to your questions and statements. Please feel free to share your story with me.

Eu

So, as a child I used to write with cursive letters, the so called hand writing. But I have no calligraphy talents, I had an ugly writing. All letters different in shape and height. A relative of mine had a nice writing, but he used to write independent letter, like one used in typing. We called it typing writing, even was written by hand too. So, I changed my writing. I started writing typing letters. Still I had an ugly writing. Anyway, this happened when I was 15 years old. A decade later it happened to stumble upon an old graphologist. I did not believed in his craft so I tested him to see if he is really good. I sent him 7 samples of writing. 5 were as follows, one brother, 2 my parents, and 2 neighbors. but the last 2 were both written by me. One with the current writing, typing writing. One with my old writing, the hand writing. I was still able to use it even I did not used it in 10 years. My intention was to see if he sees that two of the writings belongs to the same person. He did not guessed. Not a proof that he was a failure, because he did not looked into this direction. But I got a really big surprise. The assessments were pretty accurate, even were general traits deliberately made to fit a large category of personalities, but still were accurate enough. The surprise came to my two samples. It happened that in those ten years I suffered major changes. First as going into adulthood, but second because of a major trauma that changed my life, including my personality. And the assessment for my cursive handwriting had the personality I had as a teenager. So, as you, I had some neural model engrained in my brain for that writing. It contained some markers related to my personality. The typing writing obviously trained other portion of the brain. And evolved with the evolution of my personality. The handwriting model got stuck as it was when I stopped using it. Do you find it interesting?

ChatGPT

Yes, your story is interesting. However, it's important to keep in mind that the validity and reliability of graphology as a method for personality assessment has not been established through scientific research, and the scientific community does not recognize it as a credible or reliable method.

Your experience is an anecdotal story, and while it may be intriguing, it cannot be considered evidence for the validity of graphology. Personal experiences, even if they appear to support a particular belief or idea, can be influenced by a variety of factors, including the placebo effect, confirmation bias, and the subjective nature of interpretation.

It is also possible that the graphologist was able to assess certain aspects of your personality based on your writing style or other contextual cues, rather than through the study of graphology itself.

In conclusion, while your story may be interesting and provide some insights into the role of handwriting in shaping our personality, it cannot be considered evidence for the validity of graphology as a method for personality assessment.

O mică escapadă în timp.

Vînează comoara

Printre multele proiecte rămase în stadiul de idee este și unul cu acest nume.

Se voia un joc tip RPG, pentru copii, cu personaje din poveștile romînești, dar cu dialoguri amuzante. Ulterior a căzut de la RPG în format simplu html, dar tot îmi trebuia ceva grafică amuzantă. Am renunțat în final

Acum ideea a fost aplicată de altcineva, fără poveste cum intenționam eu, fără grafică, dar cu un premiu consistent, și cu etape mult mai dificile.

https://satoshistreasure.xyz

comoara poate fi a ts. Succes.

z <=> y

Te-ai întrebat vreodată de ce pe tastatura românească y este schimbat cu z ?

Logic au pus ăî şţ în loc de [];', deci au trebuit să facă manevre pentru a scoate alte semne mai putin utilizate,
dar ce treabă au şi y? Ori e o eroare, ori a glumă idioată e celui ce a compilat dllul respectiv, şi se perpetuează pentru că nu se face destul scandal pentru a ajunge zgomotul şi la MS. Voi aveţi idee care e adevărata cauză. Chiar sînt curios.

În fine, indiferent de cauză, este o chestie care m-a agasat de cînd am început să folosesc tastatura ro. Problema se poate rezolva şi la nivelul meu de novice construind un TSR care să preia caracterele şi să afişeze ce trebuie. Dar nu mi-am bătut capul. Totuşi, nu înţeleg de ce nu mi-a trecut prin cap să văd dacă a rezolvat altcineva problema mai eficient, sau mai elegant.

Şi chiar există soluţia, şi încă de acum vreo 8 ani. O găsiţi aici pe situl lui secărică, un băiat deştept care ne scoate gratis din necaz. Soluţia este elegantă, practic rescriind acel dll/driver scris de MS.

Nu înţeleg de ce nu este mai cunoscută această rezolvare. Îmi fac partea mea de datorie de a îi face publicitate aici şi printre amici. Poate ajută,  cît o mai fi  XP prin zonă.

Spune-mi ce ai pe birou...

Spune-mi ce citesti, e clasic :)



Ce ai pe birou. Ce paralela simpla si evidenta. Asa de simpla ca ma siccie faptul ca nu m-am gindit si eu la ea :)



Am vazut asta pe alt blog. m-a amuzat, asa ca hai sa copiez si eu ideea.



-Un monitor IBM P260 21 inch. Luat La SH. Cam obosit, si cam pirie

-A agenda. Noua, primita, nu o folosesc, si incurca locul pina ma gindesc unde sa o arunc.

-3 lanterne. Una mini breloc la chei, una medie, in care descarc acumulatorii de la camera, si una normala, cu leduri si acumulatori, cu alimentarea prajita, si pe care o tin sa vad, daca ii gasesc un incarcator. Sta pe agenda si ocupa locul de pomana ca si ea.

-evident cheile atasate de breloc, care stau la locul lor in mod normal

-o mini reclama, de la Real, cu produse din peste. Sint vegetarian, nu maninc nici peste, si asta a ramas aici din intimplare. Gata, nu mai este pe birou :)

-un stick de 1 giga

-7 cduri folosite si inca nepuse la locul lor.

-2 surubelnitze si ceva suruburi de la calculatorul demontat ieri,, inca nepuse unde trebuie.

-1 cutter aproape bun de aruncat. ramas aici in loc sa fie in sertar. gata, e in sertar.

-1 marker ieftin.

-o rigla plastic, din aia mai rezistenta, de pe vremuri. Nu liniez nimic, ma scarpin cu ea pe spate.

gata, e si asta in sertar

-1 blister cu piracetam

-1 capac de la un racket pt hard intern pe care trebuie sa il inapoiez proprietarului.

-aparatul foto fuji 9 MP, din care tre sa scot 3 poze, si de 3 ore nu am reusit inca. Pe asta de regul chiar il tin in sertar linga rigla de scarpinat. Cablul lui usb ramine pe masa

-tastatura mouse, evident, e redundant sa spui ca le ai ;)

-o piesa de go. Din plastic, din setul mic de 100 lei de la recoop.

-cutie cu 50 cduri defecte, adunate in 8 ani fara scop precis, poate sa le lipesc pe un perete

-Damn acum imi dau seama, ca o poza face cit o mie de cuvinte. Puteam sa fac poza si nu scriam juma de ora, dar aproape am terminat

-o cana cu ceai de musetel. licoare voodo vorba amicului caruia ii datorez capacul ala inutil

-buletinul cardul si vreo 7 lei care vor fi imediat in sertar.

-si ca sa fiu cinstit, mai era si o punga goala de la alune, si mai sint o chitanta si o coala a4 impaturita in 4 :)

-si o doza consisatenta de praf, care nu se vede in poza.

-si era sa uit. un ciorap de lina impletit de mina. Cine ghicheste la ce foloseste primeste perechea lui :))



O completare, pt precizie. Patul de linga birou e si el masa de lucru si e acoprit de cca 4 calculatoare in diverse stadii de descompunere, asta printre cduri, boxe si alte citva chestii aferente.



Si acu poza.

Enjoy:







PS Absolut intimplator, masa este acum extrem de libera si ordonata, practic e jumate goala, si de regula contine cam de vreo 5 pina la zece ori obiecte in plus, in principiu hirtii.